Confirmation Candles Indicator For ThinkorSwim

#Scan for Green Channel

def displace = 0;
def factorK = 2.0;
def lengthK = 20;
def price = close;
input averageType = AverageType.SIMPLE;
def trueRangeAverageType = AverageType.SIMPLE;
def BulgeLengthK = 150;
def SqueezeLengthK = 150;
def BulgeLengthK2 = 40;
def SqueezeLengthK2 = 40;
def BulgeLengthPrice = 75;
def SqueezeLengthPrice = 75;
def BulgeLengthPrice2 = 20;
def SqueezeLengthPrice2 = 20;

def shift = factorK * MovingAverage(trueRangeAverageType, TrueRange(high, close, low), lengthK);
def averageK = MovingAverage(averageType, price, lengthK);
def AvgK = averageK[-displace];
def Upper_BandK = averageK[-displace] + shift[-displace];
def Lower_BandK = averageK[-displace] - shift[-displace];

def conditionK1 = price >= Upper_BandK;
def conditionK2 = (Upper_BandK[1] < Upper_BandK) and (Lower_BandK[1] < Lower_BandK);
def conditionK2L = (Upper_BandK[2] < Upper_BandK[1]) and (Lower_BandK[2] < Lower_BandK[1]);
def conditionK3L = (Upper_BandK[3] < Upper_BandK[2]) and (Lower_BandK[3] < Lower_BandK[2]);
def conditionK3 = (Upper_BandK[1] > Upper_BandK) and (Lower_BandK[1] > Lower_BandK);
def BandwidthK = (Upper_BandK - Lower_BandK) / AvgK * 100;
def condition_BWKUP = BandwidthK[1] < BandwidthK;
def condition_BWKDOWN = BandwidthK[1] > BandwidthK;
def BulgeK = Highest(BandwidthK, BulgeLengthK);
def SqueezeK = Lowest(BandwidthK, SqueezeLengthK);
def BulgeK2 = Highest(BandwidthK, BulgeLengthK2);
def SqueezeK2 = Lowest(BandwidthK, SqueezeLengthK2);


plot scan = conditionK2;
 
@Christopher84 As long as I have the green dotted channel and the census indicator is green (Confirmation Level), would I stay in the trade? My answer would be "yes". Although I see several exit post indicators, the channel is still moving upward. I just want to assure that I am reading the charts correctly.

ow8rdPU.png
Overall it seems that you are reading the chart correctly, with 2 exceptions.
1. The lower study will not show a squeeze condition. The lower study is meant to show overbought and oversold conditions only. I will relabel the lines. Calling it squeeze level is probably where the confusion is coming in (sorry about that). Your interpretation of the Consensus line pulling away from support or resistance is great though.
2. The red dots and red clouds are areas to consider taking profits and reducing risk exposure. This doesn’t mean to necessarily exit your full position (although you could especially if price opens above the cloud). You will likely be able to buy back at a lower price. For instance, on your chart, if you would’ve exited your position when price was out of the cloud you would’ve been able to buy it back at a lower price as the red candle neared support.
 
Just trying to understand how the MTF starc study works, is it just plotting three levels of resistance, we already have the resistance levels from the Consensus candles and the MTF indicator cloud, trying to understand how I would use the MTF starc indicator to complement or agument the experience.
 
Overall it seems that you are reading the chart correctly, with 2 exceptions.
1. The lower study will not show a squeeze condition. The lower study is meant to show overbought and oversold conditions only. I will relabel the lines. Calling it squeeze level is probably where the confusion is coming in (sorry about that). Your interpretation of the Consensus line pulling away from support or resistance is great though.
2. The red dots and red clouds are areas to consider taking profits and reducing risk exposure. This doesn’t mean to necessarily exit your full position (although you could especially if price opens above the cloud). You will likely be able to buy back at a lower price. For instance, on your chart, if you would’ve exited your position when price was out of the cloud you would’ve been able to buy it back at a lower price as the red candle neared support.
Oh, Okay that make so much sense about exiting the position and go back in. Thanks so much and thanks again for being available. This is really helping me to getting ready for Tuesday.
 
I am just confirming. Are there 3 Lower Levels for CC?

bo2StNr.png
There have been 5 different versions of the confirmation candles lower. Your top lower study is the most current version of the Confirmation Candles lower study. It looks like your lowest indicator is for the Consensus Confirmation Candles. I hope that helps.
 
Just trying to understand how the MTF starc study works, is it just plotting three levels of resistance, we already have the resistance levels from the Consensus candles and the MTF indicator cloud, trying to understand how I would use the MTF starc indicator to complement or agument the experience.
Hi alesmith3546!
I like to use it to set potential targets as well as see the higher time frame trend. It’s not something I leave up on my lower time frame charts.
 
This example is from page 1 of the thread.

Please help me understand: The green point OS looks to buy with green cloud and blue arrow pointing. What indication do I use to know that it is heading to a downtrend since I don't see a cloud nor red dot to take profit? My answer would be there is a green candle nearing the red channel. So there will not always be a warning indication to take profit.
G8vLjiw.png
 
This example is from page 1 of the thread.

Please help me understand: The green point OS looks to buy with green cloud and blue arrow pointing. What indication do I use to know that it is heading to a downtrend since I don't see a cloud nor red dot to take profit? My answer would be there is a green candle nearing the red channel. So there will not always be a warning indication to take profit.
G8vLjiw.png
Hi tjlizwelicha!
That’s an example of a mean reversion entry. You would exit on a green candle, especially nearing resistance. Just like you look to buy red candles in green channels, you look to sell green candles in red channels.
 
Hi Madhu,
There is a code posted by Fluideng on this page. I haven’t got to try it out yet. I like to use my watchlist columns to spot the red candle in a green channel as well.


This is a scan for a red candle in a green channel but its too complex, Maybe someone here can fix it?


#Keltner Channel
#declare upper;
def displace = 0;
def factorK = 2.0;
def lengthK = 20;
def price = close;
input averageType = AverageType.SIMPLE;
def trueRangeAverageType = AverageType.SIMPLE;
def BulgeLengthK = 150;
def SqueezeLengthK = 150;
def BulgeLengthK2 = 40;
def SqueezeLengthK2 = 40;
def BulgeLengthPrice = 75;
def SqueezeLengthPrice = 75;
def BulgeLengthPrice2 = 20;
def SqueezeLengthPrice2 = 20;

def shift = factorK * MovingAverage(trueRangeAverageType, TrueRange(high, close, low), lengthK);
def averageK = MovingAverage(averageType, price, lengthK);
def AvgK = averageK[-displace];
def Upper_BandK = averageK[-displace] + shift[-displace];
def Lower_BandK = averageK[-displace] - shift[-displace];

def conditionK1 = price >= Upper_BandK;
def conditionK2 = (Upper_BandK[1] < Upper_BandK) and (Lower_BandK[1] < Lower_BandK);
def conditionK2L = (Upper_BandK[2] < Upper_BandK[1]) and (Lower_BandK[2] < Lower_BandK[1]);
def conditionK3L = (Upper_BandK[3] < Upper_BandK[2]) and (Lower_BandK[3] < Lower_BandK[2]);
def conditionK3 = (Upper_BandK[1] > Upper_BandK) and (Lower_BandK[1] > Lower_BandK);
def BandwidthK = (Upper_BandK - Lower_BandK) / AvgK * 100;
def condition_BWKUP = BandwidthK[1] < BandwidthK;
def condition_BWKDOWN = BandwidthK[1] > BandwidthK;
def BulgeK = Highest(BandwidthK, BulgeLengthK);
def SqueezeK = Lowest(BandwidthK, SqueezeLengthK);
def BulgeK2 = Highest(BandwidthK, BulgeLengthK2);
def SqueezeK2 = Lowest(BandwidthK, SqueezeLengthK2);

#MACD with Price
def fastLength = 12;
def slowLength = 26;
def MACDLength = 9;
input MACD_AverageType = {SMA, default EMA};
def MACDLevel = 0.0;

def fastEMA = ExpAverage(price, fastLength);
def slowEMA = ExpAverage(price, slowLength);
def Value;
def Avg;
switch (MACD_AverageType) {
case SMA:
Value = Average(price, fastLength) - Average(price, slowLength);
Avg = Average(Value, MACDLength);
case EMA:
Value = fastEMA - slowEMA;
Avg = ExpAverage(Value, MACDLength);
}
def Diff = Value - Avg;
def Level = MACDLevel;

def condition1 = Value[1] <= Value;

#RSI
def RSI_length = 14;
def RSI_AverageType = AverageType.WILDERS;
def RSI_OB = 70;
def RSI_OS = 30;

def NetChgAvg = MovingAverage(RSI_AverageType, price - price[1], RSI_length);
def TotChgAvg = MovingAverage(RSI_AverageType, AbsValue(price - price[1]), RSI_length);
def ChgRatio = if TotChgAvg != 0 then NetChgAvg / TotChgAvg else 0;
def RSI = 50 * (ChgRatio + 1);

def condition2 = (RSI[3] < RSI) is true or (RSI >= 80) is true;
def conditionOB1 = RSI > RSI_OB;
def conditionOS1 = RSI < RSI_OS;

#MFI
def MFI_Length = 14;
def MFIover_Sold = 20;
def MFIover_Bought = 80;
def movingAvgLength = 1;
def MoneyFlowIndex = Average(MoneyFlow(high, close, low, volume, MFI_Length), movingAvgLength);
def MFIOverBought = MFIover_Bought;
def MFIOverSold = MFIover_Sold;

def condition3 = (MoneyFlowIndex[2] < MoneyFlowIndex) is true or (MoneyFlowIndex > 85) is true;
def conditionOB2 = MoneyFlowIndex > MFIover_Bought;
def conditionOS2 = MoneyFlowIndex < MFIover_Sold;

#Forecast
def na = Double.NaN;
def MidLine = 50;
def Momentum = MarketForecast().Momentum;
def NearT = MarketForecast().NearTerm;
def Intermed = MarketForecast().Intermediate;
def FOB = 80;
def FOS = 20;
def upperLine = 110;

def condition4 = (Intermed[1] <= Intermed) or (NearT >= MidLine);
def conditionOB3 = Intermed > FOB;
def conditionOS3 = Intermed < FOS;
def conditionOB4 = NearT > FOB;
def conditionOS4 = NearT < FOS;

#Change in Price
def lengthCIP = 5;
def CIP = (price - price[1]);
def AvgCIP = ExpAverage(CIP[-displace], lengthCIP);
def CIP_UP = AvgCIP > AvgCIP[1];

def condition5 = CIP_UP;

#EMA_1
def EMA_length = 12;
def AvgExp = ExpAverage(price[-displace], EMA_length);

def condition6 = (price >= AvgExp) and (AvgExp[2] <= AvgExp);

#EMA_2
def EMA_2length = 20;
def displace2 = 0;
def AvgExp2 = ExpAverage(price[-displace2], EMA_2length);

def condition7 = (price >= AvgExp2) and (AvgExp[2] <= AvgExp);

#DMI Oscillator
def DMI_length = 5;#Typically set to 10
input DMI_averageType = AverageType.WILDERS;
def diPlus = DMI(DMI_length, DMI_averageType)."DI+";
def diMinus = DMI(DMI_length, DMI_averageType)."DI-";
def Osc = diPlus - diMinus;
def Hist = Osc;
def ZeroLine = 0;

def condition8 = Osc >= ZeroLine;

#Trend_Periods
def TP_fastLength = 3;#Typically 7
def TP_slowLength = 4;#Typically 15
def Periods = Sign(ExpAverage(close, TP_fastLength) - ExpAverage(close, TP_slowLength));

def condition9 = Periods > 0;

#Polarized Fractal Efficiency
def PFE_length = 5;#Typically 10
def smoothingLength = 2.5;#Typically 5
def PFE_diff = close - close[PFE_length - 1];
def val = 100 * Sqrt(Sqr(PFE_diff) + Sqr(PFE_length)) / Sum(Sqrt(1 + Sqr(close - close[1])), PFE_length - 1);
def PFE = ExpAverage(if PFE_diff > 0 then val else -val, smoothingLength);
def UpperLevel = 50;
def LowerLevel = -50;

def condition10 = PFE > 0;
def conditionOB5 = PFE > UpperLevel;
def conditionOS5 = PFE < LowerLevel;

#Bollinger Bands PercentB
input BBPB_averageType = AverageType.SIMPLE;
def BBPB_length = 20;#Typically 20
def Num_Dev_Dn = -2.0;
def Num_Dev_up = 2.0;
def BBPB_OB = 100;
def BBPB_OS = 0;
def upperBand = BollingerBands(price, displace, BBPB_length, Num_Dev_Dn, Num_Dev_up, BBPB_averageType).UpperBand;
def lowerBand = BollingerBands(price, displace, BBPB_length, Num_Dev_Dn, Num_Dev_up, BBPB_averageType).LowerBand;
def PercentB = (price - lowerBand) / (upperBand - lowerBand) * 100;
def HalfLine = 50;
def UnitLine = 100;

def condition11 = PercentB > HalfLine;
def conditionOB6 = PercentB > BBPB_OB;
def conditionOS6 = PercentB < BBPB_OS;

#STARC Bands
def ATR_length = 15;
def SMA_lengthS = 6;
def multiplier_factor = 1.25;
def valS = Average(price, SMA_lengthS);
def average_true_range = Average(TrueRange(high, close, low), length = ATR_length);
def Upper_BandS = valS[-displace] + multiplier_factor * average_true_range[-displace];
def Middle_BandS = valS[-displace];
def Lower_BandS = valS[-displace] - multiplier_factor * average_true_range[-displace];

def condition12 = (Upper_BandS[1] <= Upper_BandS) and (Lower_BandS[1] <= Lower_BandS);

#Klinger Histogram
def Klinger_Length = 13;
def KVOsc = KlingerOscillator(Klinger_Length).KVOsc;
def KVOH = KVOsc - Average(KVOsc, Klinger_Length);
def condition13 = (KVOH > 0);

#Projection Oscillator
def ProjectionOsc_length = 30;#Typically 10
def MaxBound = HighestWeighted(high, ProjectionOsc_length, LinearRegressionSlope(price = high, length = ProjectionOsc_length));
def MinBound = LowestWeighted(low, ProjectionOsc_length, LinearRegressionSlope(price = low, length = ProjectionOsc_length));
def ProjectionOsc_diff = MaxBound - MinBound;
def PROSC = if ProjectionOsc_diff != 0 then 100 * (close - MinBound) / ProjectionOsc_diff else 0;
def PROSC_OB = 80;
def PROSC_OS = 20;

def condition14 = (PROSC > 50);# or ((PROSC[1] < PROSC) and PROSC > 40);
def conditionOB7 = PROSC > PROSC_OB;
def conditionOS7 = PROSC < PROSC_OS;

#Trend Confirmation Calculator
#Confirmation_Factor range 1-15.
input coloredCandlesOn = yes;
input Confirmation_Factor = 7;
#Use for testing conditions individually. Remove # from line below and change Confirmation_Factor to 1.
#def Agreement_Level = condition1;
def Agreement_LevelOB = 12;
def Agreement_LevelOS = 3;

def Agreement_Level = condition1 + condition2 + condition3 + condition4 + condition5 + condition6 + condition7 + condition8 + condition9 + condition10 + condition11 + condition12 + condition13 + condition14 + conditionK1 + conditionK2;

def conditionChannel1 = Upper_BandK > price;
def conditionChannel2 = Lower_BandK < price;

def UP = Agreement_Level >= Confirmation_Factor;
def DOWN = Agreement_Level < Confirmation_Factor;

def GreenCandle = coloredCandlesOn and UP;
def RedCandle = coloredCandlesOn and down;

plot scan = Redcandle and conditionK2;
 
I am trying to copy and past the thinkscript for the Day Scan and The Week Scan Only, but I keep getting the same error on both. Could someone tell me what I am doing wrong? This is from Thread#173


PjvhGfy.png
 

Join useThinkScript to post your question to a community of 21,000+ developers and traders.

Not the exact question you're looking for?

Start a new thread and receive assistance from our community.

87k+ Posts
206 Online
Create Post

The Market Trading Game Changer

Join 2,500+ subscribers inside the useThinkScript VIP Membership Club
  • Exclusive indicators
  • Proven strategies & setups
  • Private Discord community
  • ‘Buy The Dip’ signal alerts
  • Exclusive members-only content
  • Add-ons and resources
  • 1 full year of unlimited support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is useThinkScript?

useThinkScript is the #1 community of stock market investors using indicators and other tools to power their trading strategies. Traders of all skill levels use our forums to learn about scripting and indicators, help each other, and discover new ways to gain an edge in the markets.

How do I get started?

We get it. Our forum can be intimidating, if not overwhelming. With thousands of topics, tens of thousands of posts, our community has created an incredibly deep knowledge base for stock traders. No one can ever exhaust every resource provided on our site.

If you are new, or just looking for guidance, here are some helpful links to get you started.

What are the benefits of VIP Membership?
VIP members get exclusive access to these proven and tested premium indicators: Buy the Dip, Advanced Market Moves 2.0, Take Profit, and Volatility Trading Range. In addition, VIP members get access to over 50 VIP-only custom indicators, add-ons, and strategies, private VIP-only forums, private Discord channel to discuss trades and strategies in real-time, customer support, trade alerts, and much more. Learn all about VIP membership here.
How can I access the premium indicators?
To access the premium indicators, which are plug and play ready, sign up for VIP membership here.
Back
Top