Advanced approaches to detect Trend vs Sideways

[D_Tramp]

Hi All,

I’m specifically looking for non-standard and more advanced approaches in thinkScript to classify whether a stock is currently in a trending regime or a ranging / sideways / choppy regime. I’m already very familiar with the classic tools (ADX thresholds, moving average slope/alignment, Bollinger Bandwidth, ATR vs its average, basic higher-highs/higher-lows structure, etc.), so please skip those.

What I’m interested in:
- statistical / quantitative measures that can be coded in thinkScript

(Kaufman Efficiency Ratio and its variations, approximations of Hurst exponent, Fractal Dimension, Choppiness Index if used in a more sophisticated way, linear regression R-squared + slope combinations, entropy-based measures, variance ratio tests, etc.)​

- any custom multi-factor or hybrid regime filters that go beyond the usual indicators
- scripts that produce a clean regime label / state (Trend / Range / Transition) using less common math
- anything people have developed or found useful that feels more “quantitative” and less laggy than the standard toolkit

If you have (or know of) threads/scripts that implement any of the above - or your own experimental approaches - I’d really appreciate links, code, or descriptions of what actually works well on stocks in TOS.

Thanks a lot!

 

[useThinkScript]

"Sideways" is a ranging result that is caused by multi-dimensional footprint across Price Action, Candle Patterns, and Volume Dynamics

Market Behavior	Candle / Price Action Pattern	Volume Dynamics	Resulting Regime State	Why Standard Metrics Fail
Institutional Accumulation / Distribution	Tight price bounds, frequent long wicks on one side (rejection).	High, steady, or spiking volume at bound edges without price continuation.	Squeeze / Coiling	High volume tricks trend/momentum indicators into expecting a breakout prematurely.
Market Apathy / Low Liquidity	Small real bodies, overlapping bars, low intra-bar range (narrow spreads).	Substantially below-average, declining volume.	Dormant Sideways	Volatility-based metrics drop, but breakout signals produce high slippage and false triggers.
Equilibrium Price Discovery (Value Area)	Symmetric bell-curve distribution of price around a point of control (POC).	High volume centered at the middle of the range; dropping volume at edges.	Balanced Range	Statistical metrics see zero directional drift, mistaking consolidation for zero momentum.
Volatility Compression (Contraction)	Decreasing high-to-low ranges per candle; forming wedges/pennants.	Volume steadily drying up as price moves toward the apex.	Volatility Squeeze	Linear regression slope drops to near 0, missing the explosive potential energy build-up.
Stop-Hunting / Mean-Reverting Churn	Large candle bodies with immediate full-bar reversals (whipsaws), breaking recent swings.	High, erratic volume spikes on Reversal bars.	Choppy / Expansion-Range Sideways	ADX drops, but standard Deviation/ATR explodes—tricking filters into seeing a "trending" state.

As you have seen, there are issues when using standard indicators. Some can be overcome; some cannot.

Which specific market behavior are you attempting to identify?

 

[D_Tramp]

"Sideways" is a ranging result that is caused by multi-dimensional footprint across Price Action, Candle Patterns, and Volume Dynamics

Market Behavior	Candle / Price Action Pattern	Volume Dynamics	Resulting Regime State	Why Standard Metrics Fail
Institutional Accumulation / Distribution	Tight price bounds, frequent long wicks on one side (rejection).	High, steady, or spiking volume at bound edges without price continuation.	Squeeze / Coiling	High volume tricks trend/momentum indicators into expecting a breakout prematurely.
Market Apathy / Low Liquidity	Small real bodies, overlapping bars, low intra-bar range (narrow spreads).	Substantially below-average, declining volume.	Dormant Sideways	Volatility-based metrics drop, but breakout signals produce high slippage and false triggers.
Equilibrium Price Discovery (Value Area)	Symmetric bell-curve distribution of price around a point of control (POC).	High volume centered at the middle of the range; dropping volume at edges.	Balanced Range	Statistical metrics see zero directional drift, mistaking consolidation for zero momentum.
Volatility Compression (Contraction)	Decreasing high-to-low ranges per candle; forming wedges/pennants.	Volume steadily drying up as price moves toward the apex.	Volatility Squeeze	Linear regression slope drops to near 0, missing the explosive potential energy build-up.
Stop-Hunting / Mean-Reverting Churn	Large candle bodies with immediate full-bar reversals (whipsaws), breaking recent swings.	High, erratic volume spikes on Reversal bars.	Choppy / Expansion-Range Sideways	ADX drops, but standard Deviation/ATR explodes—tricking filters into seeing a "trending" state.

As you have seen, there are issues when using standard indicators. Some can be overcome; some cannot.

Which specific market behavior are you attempting to identify?

Thank you for the detailed breakdown — this is extremely helpful.You’re absolutely right: treating “sideways” as a single regime is too crude. The multi-dimensional view (Price Action + Candle Patterns + Volume Dynamics) makes much more sense, especially when standard metrics start failing.

What I’m ultimately trying to build is a reliable, codeable regime filter that can distinguish:

1) True trending conditions
2) Different subtypes of non-trending / ranging environments (particularly the ones that look like Squeeze/Coiling, Volatility Compression, and Choppy/Expansion-Range Sideways)

The goal is to have a clean state output (or probability scores) that I can use as a filter in strategies — preferably something quantitative enough to be implemented in thinkScript without heavy discretionary interpretation.Do you (or anyone else) have any existing scripts, approaches, or combinations that try to classify these more nuanced regimes using a multi-factor footprint (price action structure + volume behavior + candle characteristics)?Even partial implementations or ideas on how to quantify these distinctions would be gold.Thanks again for taking the time to explain this so clearly.